Cancer Expert Search

Cancer ExpertCancer Expert: Search
Enter your question and submit. Use a complete English sentence for better results.
Cancer Expert, © 2012-2013, ctSearch - Context Search Engine.
Showing posts with label Aasra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aasra. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 04, 2016

Invitation to a Talk- The Importance of Mental Health Care in Everyday Life- johnson Thomas , AASRA

Get Proactive about your mental health Care. Understand how you can keep yourself stable, consistent and resilient when all around you is filled with turmoil. Aasra's interactive talk on Mental health care at HELP library on Saturday,7th May 2016, 3.30 pm.5th Flr, Ashish Bkd, Nr Tardeo end of Bombay Central Bridge, Tardeo , Mumbai


‪#‎aasradotinfo‬ #SamaritansUK‪ #‎aasrasuicideprevention24x7Helpline912227546669‬
‪#‎AFSP‬ ‪#‎IASP‬ ‪#‎INFOTES‬ ‪#‎BefriendersWorldwide‬ ‪#‎WHO‬ ‪#‎UN‬




Thursday, July 10, 2014

Multitasking...good or Bad???

URL: http://changeyourideas.com/2014/02/demerits-of-multi-tasking/

Author of the blog: Murli M Lohia

Email: murlilohia@changeyourideas.com

(de)Merits of Multi-tasking!

Most believe that multi-tasking is more efficient than doing single task at a time. General perception is that you can do it faster through multi-tasking and quality can still be achieved.

Human mind is such that it is always loaded with multiple thoughts. It is rare that only one thought is crossing our mind at a time. If we have 2 or more tasks to perform and we try to concentrate on one at a time, then we tend to remember 2nd task - "Oh that also has to be done"! And in this process, we often land-up doing 2nd task also and that's how we form habit of multi-tasking over a period of time.

On the other hand, there are several thought leaders, who advise against doing more than one thing at a time.

So, does multi-tasking really have merits?

Mystery of Mind

Our mind is the emperor and gives the command for everything that we think, experience or do. But, we need to understand one fact about our mind - it can hold only one thought or image at a time! Consequently, our cognitive sense can recognize only one signal or piece of information at a time. However, such pieces of information, let us call it as train of thoughts, passes through our mind at nearly speed of light. Because of such high speed, at which the train of our thoughts travels, we perceive that we have multiple thoughts at the same time. In fact, our thoughts are discrete pulses of the said train.

Pieces of information in our mind are like blades of a ceiling fan, which look distinct if fan is stationary or rotating at slow speed. If fan speed is increased, then beyond a certain point, we cannot distinguish the blades. These look as one unbroken object - a disk. Same analogy applies to train of thoughts; these appear as if same exist simultaneously!

What happens, when we multi-task

Assume that we are doing 2 tasks in so to say same time. For each task, our mind has a train of thoughts. When we attempt to do these 2 tasks together, 2 trains of thoughts get mixed and hence, we alternate between the two tasks. It is our illusion that we are doing 2 tasks simultaneously; we are doing these 2 in highly broken manner. Our focus also gets split into 2 or into as many number as the tasks, which we attempt to do together.

Net result of above is that either we will commit more mistakes, due to diluted focus and then more take time to correct the same or slow down to avoid committing mistakes. Yet, we would have a false notion that we have done it faster.

In multi-tasking, either efficiency or quality or both suffer!

What to do, when you believe multi-tasking is inevitable

You do come across several situations, when you can't help but do multi-tasking, especially if you face crisis. It is best then to break each task in cognizable steps, complete 1st step of task 1, then to switch 1st step of task 2 followed by 1st step of task 3, swing back to 2nd step of task 1 and so on. If you have observed some people doing multi-tasking successfully, that's what they exactly do!

In above process, what you actually do is to take one step i.e. sub-task at a time. You do not actually multi-task. It is only then that it works. In routine life, it is not easy to follow organized sequence of steps of multiple tasks; most likely, you would create a mess! Under crisis or emergency, you are auto-driven to do that.

Maladies of multi-tasking

Our mind wanders uncontrollably and hence, it is not easy to control flow of our thoughts! On the top of it, if we develop habit of multi-tasking, it can only get worse!!

Some of maladies of multi-tasking are:

Net speed of your actions would be slower and quality is likely to suffer.

You would be less effective in your organization.

You could be hyper active or sensitive and are likely to face problems in your relationships.

Most mistakes, mishaps and even miseries are consequences of multi-tasking! 

Classical multi-tasking causes mental fatigue.

Successes would delude you, since you lack or have little of what is needed - Focus!

Your mind would be normally cluttered with thoughts or ideas, which can probably make you creative but at the same time chaotic and confused most times.

Practicing to focus on single tasks or sub-tasks has all virtues; but, one of its great by-products is - it helps you develop consciousness!

Saturday, April 05, 2014

Religious fundamentalism could soon be treated as mental illness

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/351347

Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/351347#ixzz2xzrhVTbq

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/351347

Kathleen Taylor, a neurologist at Oxford University, said that recent developments suggest that we will soon be able to treat religious fundamentalism and other forms of ideological beliefs potentially harmful to society as a form of mental illness.
She made the assertion during a talk at the Hay Literary Festival in Wales on Wednesday. She said that radicalizing ideologies may soon be viewed not as being of personal choice or free will but as a category of mental disorder. She said new developments in neuroscience could make it possible to consider extremists as people with mental illness rather than criminals.
She told The Times of London: "One of the surprises may be to see people with certain beliefs as people who can be treated. Someone who has for example become radicalized to a cult ideology -- we might stop seeing that as a personal choice that they have chosen as a result of pure free will and may start treating it as some kind of mental disturbance."
Taylor admits that the scope of what could end up being labelled "fundamentalist" is expansive. She continued: "I am not just talking about the obvious candidates like radical Islam or some of the more extreme cults. I am talking about things like the belief that it is OK to beat your children. These beliefs are very harmful but are not normally categorized as mental illness. In many ways that could be a very positive thing because there are no doubt beliefs in our society that do a heck of a lot of damage, that really do a lot of harm."
The Huffington Post reports Taylor warns about the moral-ethical complications that could arise.
In her book "The Brain Supremacy," she writes of the need "to be careful when it comes to developing technologies which can slip through the skull to directly manipulate the brain. They cannot be morally neutral, these world-shaping tools; when the aspect of the world in question is a human being, morality inevitably rears its hydra heads. Technologies which profoundly change our relationship with the world around us cannot simply be tools, to be used for good or evil, if they alter our basic perception of what good and evil are."
[In related news: Atheism a 'suicide risk,' US Marine Corps warns]
The moral-ethical dimension arises from the predictable tendency when acting on the problem, armed with a new technology, to apply to the label "fundamentalist" only to our ideological opponents, while failing to perceive the "fundamentalism" in ourselves.
From the perspective of the Western mind, for instance, the tendency to equate "fundamentalism" exclusively with radical Islamism is too tempting. But how much less "fundamentalist" than an Osama bin Laden is a nation of capitalist ideologues carpet bombing civilian urban areas in Laos, Cambodia and North Korea?
The jihadist's obsession with defending his Islamic ideological world view which leads him to perpetrate and justify such barbaric acts as the Woolwich murder are of the same nature as the evangelical obsession with spreading the pseudo-religious ideology of capitalism which led to such horrendous crimes as the murder ofhundreds of thousands of civilians in four years of carpet bombing operations by the Nixon administration caught in a vice grip of anti-communist paranoia.
The power to control the mind will tend too readily to be used as weapon against our jihadist enemies while justifying the equally irrational and murderously harmful actions we term innocously "foreign policy."
Some analysts are thus convinced that neuroscientists will be adopting a parochial and therefore ultimately counterproductive approach if they insist on identifying particular belief systems characteristic of ideological opponents as the primary subject for therapeutic manipulation.
On a much larger and potentially more fruitful scale is the recognition that the entire domain of religious beliefs, political convictions, patriotic nationalist fervor are in themselves powerful platforms for nurturing "Us vs Them" paranoid delusional fantasies which work out destructively in a 9/11 attack or a Hiroshima/Nagasaki orgy of mass destruction.
What we perceive from our perspective as our legitimate self-defensive reaction to the psychosis of the enemy, is from the perspective of the same enemy our equally malignant psychotic self-obsession.
The Huffington Post reports that this is not the first time Taylor has written a book about extremism and fundamentalism. In 2006, she wrote a book about mind control titled "Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control," in which she examined the techniques that cultic groups use to influence victims.
She said: "We all change our beliefs of course. We all persuade each other to do things; we all watch advertising; we all get educated and experience [religions.] Brainwashing, if you like, is the extreme end of that; it's the coercive, forceful, psychological torture type."
She notes correctly that "brainwashing" which embraces all the subtle and not-so-subtle ways "we make people think things that might not be good for them, that they might not otherwise have chosen to think," is a much more pervasive social phenomenon than we are willing to recognize. As social animals we are all victims of culturally induced brainwashing whose effectiveness correlates with our inability to think outside the box of our given acculturation.


Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/351347#ixzz2y01z7G3S

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

http://www.thebetterindia.com/9108/phone-call-can-save-life/

http://www.thebetterindia.com/9108/phone-call-can-save-life/


A Phone Call That Can Save A Life!

- See more at: http://www.thebetterindia.com/9108/phone-call-can-save-life/#sthash.xiHIbLij.dpuf

We all realize that life is precious and yet every day, some or other person loses hope in life and gives in to suicide. Don’t we all wish to help them during their crisis of depression? NGOs like AASRA do it. Featured today on The Better India platform, Johnson Thomas, the Director of AASRA talks on how his NGO works to prevent suicides.
Life is a war. Doctors fight disease. Lawyers fight injustice. Teachers fight ignorance. AASRA fights to prevent suicide – that’s the theme behind AASRA NGO.
aasra4Johnson Thomas, the director told us that Aasra is a crisis intervention centre for the distressed, depressed and suicidal. It’s basically an emotional support service providing emotional first-aid to those who are contemplating suicide or are on the verge or in the process of committing the act.
We started way back in 1998, fifteen years ago on 13th September. A year before that we found that there were a high number of suicides in Navi Mumbai among the student community. This was a very worrying development and a group of people came together to set up this service as succor for those experiencing extreme emotional pain because of their problems they are facing. The service was for everybody and not just for students. We started out as a 6-hour helpline from 3pm to 9pm daily and then expanded to two lines for 24×7 services. Our team consists of volunteers from all walks of life specially selected for their innate qualities and professionally trained to provide emotional support to the depressed and suicidal.
As Johnson elaborated further, Aasra gets callers from all walks of life , from all across India and the world.
NGO Aasra has succeeded in saving 311891 lives so far!
NGO Aasra has succeeded in saving 311,891 lives so far!
Mostly students, newly employed young adults, unemployed youth, youngsters experiencing break-ups or loss, recently retired, ageing and alone and terminally ill patients seek help from them. Johnson also elaborated a little on why depression and suicidal tendencies are increasing these days.
The world is changing and changing fast. Especially in India where the entry of multi-nationals and globalisation has set new patterns of behaviour among the middle class! They are left with little time to pursue their interests or give time to family while their desire for wealth and riches and status has grown exponentially. So this increases the stress on the family which is ill-equipped to deal with the changing scenario. The supportive factor i.e the joint family system which kept our families psychologically supported, has crumbled in most parts of India. As a result when crisis strikes, there is no one to turn to. Very often, the spouse or near or dear one is the cause of the problem or involved in the problem hence can do little to alleviate the pain. This has increased the psychological fragility of the new generation leading to an increased incidence of depression and is therefore leading them to suicide as an option.
aasra1Johnson talked further about Aasra’s role in helping people with suicidal tendencies.
Along with a Helpline facility, Aasra does many other activities as well. It organizes awareness talks, conduct workshops on suicide awareness, coping skills, stress management etc, visits hospitals, terminally ill care-centres, arranges public events, associates with college fests and events, distributes book marks, writes for blogs, websites and social media connections, provides email service, responds to letters, conducts street plays and so one. We even have events to commemorate world suicide prevention day/week/month, mental health week/day as well as Suicide Survivors Day.
Now that is quite an extensive list and we are truly impressed with Aasra’s bouquet of services. Its ten years of consistent high quality service and commitment have made it stand out as a big and reliable lifeline for many people all across India. It is because of their outstanding efforts in the field of suicide prevention that in January 2006, AASRA was awarded the Maharashtra Ratna Gaurav Puraskar, (awarded to NGO’s, activists, personalities of repute) by the Shiv Sangram Pratisthan, devoted to pursuing, upholding and commending the ideals of Shivaji Maharaj.
Aasra Director Johnson Thomas feels communication is a big support in suicide prevention
Aasra Director Johnson Thomas feels communication is a big support in suicide prevention
NGOs like Aasra are doing a very noble job. Life is the biggest gift and we all must live it fully. Aasra’s team consists of volunteers who deserve a round of applause. These volunteers are professionally trained and supported by internal systems. They come from all walks of life and classes. All the volunteers of Aasra, most of them being students, teachers, housewives, retired folk, young employed etc; are doing a wonderful job.
Johnson told us that their focus in the future is to expand their services by increasing their intake of calls with the help of new technology, provide a toll free number and also provide day care facilities and have a half-way home for people who are mentally ill and need professional support.
aasra2 (1)
We thank Johnson for sparing his valuable time to share Aasra’s vision with us. For any assistance please call their 24×7 Helpline number: 022-27546669. And all those readers who wish to join Aasra and spread the beauty of life around can do so by visiting their website here.
This post was first published on Halabol Voices, which is an initiative of Halabol – a platform for initiating change.
- See more at: http://www.thebetterindia.com/9108/phone-call-can-save-life/#sthash.xiHIbLij.dpuf

Monday, January 27, 2014

National income, life satisfaction, and male-female suicide ratio in industrialised countries.

Abstract

The relationships between gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, life satisfaction, and male-female suicide ratio were analyzed for 25 industrialized countries. GDP per capita was the strongest correlate of male-female suicide ratio even when life satisfaction was controlled using partial correlations. Life satisfaction correlated significantly with GDP per capita but not with suicide rates.

It's a known fact that more men suceed in killing themselves because their chosen methods are oft more irreversible/permanent: ie, a shotgun in the mouth as opposed to wrist slitting or ODing on pills. My question is: Has anyone figured out a link? Are more of men's suicides just plain "I want to die" as opposed to a female doing it as a cry for help, hoping she'll be stopped, which therefore leads her to use a less likely fatal method? Are females, in some strange way, trying to make it "easier" on their loved ones by leaving behind a nice corpse, whereas men don't give a damn? Or is it something else altogether?


Suicide is a Predominantly Male Problem
Randolph Nesse, M.D. and colleagues at the University of Michigan examined premature deaths among men in 20 countries. They suggest that as many as 375,000 lives could be saved in the US alone if male mortality rates were brought into line with those of women. Being male is now the single largest demographic factor for early death, the study concluded. "If you could make male mortality rates the same as female rates, you would do more good than curing cancer," Nesse says.[i]
Nowhere is this more evident than in looking at suicide rates. Each year, about 31,000 Americans commit suicide, making it the eighth leading cause of death in the United States. Almost every American has a relative, friend, or acquaintance who has killed himself. But what is often lost in the statistics and reports of suicide among "Americans," or our "youth" or "high school" or "college" students is that the vast majority of these deaths occur in males.
Once thought to be primarily a white male problem, suicide is increasingly dramatically in the Black community. "The staggering growth in the number of black male suicides over the last 10 years is shocking," says Susan Burks a writer for the Denver Post. "Suicide is now the third-leading cause of death for African-American males ages 15 through 24. Suicide among black youth, once uncommon, showed a rate increase of 233 percent increase for boys between the ages of 10 and 14. Black teenagers in this country are killing themselves at a rate of 5 per day. Sixty-five percent of them are using firearms to do it."[ii]
Whether Black, Caucasian, or any other racial or ethnic group, the number one risk factor for suicide is being male. In 1999, the suicide death rate was 18.2/100,000 among males, and 4.1 in females. This means that male suicides outnumbered female suicides by a ratio of more than 4 to 1.[iii] The imbalance between the number of males who kill themselves and the number of females who die by their own hand is evident throughout the life-cycle as the following table illustrates:
Estimated Annual Suicide Rate per 100,000 by Age and Gender[iv]
Age RangeMaleFemaleRatio M:F
5-141.30.43.25
15-1918.53.76.08
20-2427.24.07.35
25-6425.66.14.20
65-8549.45.19.68
85 +75.05.015.0
Points of Understanding
  • Even for children between 5 and 14 years of age when suicides are low, males are more than 3 times as likely to kill themselves as females.
  • For teens between 15 and 19 the ratio nearly doubles with males killing themselves 6 times as often as females.During the young adult years, 20-24, the ratio jumps again to over 7 times.
  • In the adult years between 25 and 64, the male rate drops slightly and the female rate increases, but the ratio of male to female suicides is still more than 4 to 1.
  • However, in the retirement years after age between 65 and 85, the ratio more than doubles with more than 9 men killing themselves for every woman.
  • For the "old, old" over 85, the female rate drops slightly while the male rate increases dramatically. For those men who are fortunate to be alive after 85 fifteen times more men kill themselves than women.
  • There seem to be a number of factors that may account for the increased rate as men age. Being socially isolated, divorced, or widowed are important risk factors for men.[v]
The male suicide rate is also worrisome outside the United States. Worldwide, suicide claimed the lives of an estimated 815,000 people in 2000, the majority of which were males.[vi] The extent to which males outnumber females in suicide varies by country. For instance, in certain parts of China, where people most often kill themselves using chemical poisons found on rural farms, the numbers are nearly equal. However, in all other countries in the world males outnumber females. The sex disparity is especially high in countries of Eastern Europe and Latin America. Interestingly Puerto Rico has the highest ratio, with males killing themselves at rates more than 10 times that of females.[vii]
It is clear that men kill themselves at rates many times that of females in nearly all parts of the world. Yet females attempt suicide much more often. Most studies suggest that females experience depression at rates twice as high as males. Yet, we know that depression is highly associated with suicide. This raises some interesting and important questions. If the studies show that females tend to be more depressed than males, why do males have such high suicide rates? Are females really more depressed than males or are we failing to recognize depression in men? To answer these questions we need to delve more deeply into the world of depression.
Does this sound familiar? Drop me a line and let me know what you have experienced.

[i] Being a man is bad for health. BBC News. July 24, 2002.
[ii] Susan Burks. Denver Post, January 3, 2003, Accessed on the internet January 12, 2003 at www.denverpost.com/Stories/
[iii] National Center for Health Statistics: Health, United States, 2002. Hyattsville, MD, Table 30.
[iv] Summarized from R. Anderson, K. Kochanek & S. Murphy. Report of final mortality statistics.Monthly Vital Statistics Report, 45 (11), Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1997 and from G. Murphy. "Why women are less likely than men to commit suicide." Comprehensive Psychiatry, 39, 1998, 165-175. Reported in Sam V. Cochran and Fredric E. Rabinowitz. Men and Depression: Clinical and Empirical Perspectives. San Diego, California: Academic Press, 2000, p. 141.
[v] Centers for Disease Control, Suicide among Older Persons, United States, 1980-1992. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, January 12, 1996.
[vi] E.G. Krug, et al., eds. World report on violence and health. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2002, 185.
[vii] Ibid., 186-187.
Does this sound familiar? Drop me a line and let me know what you have experienced.

Modernization and the Male–Female Suicide Ratio in India 1967–1997: Divergence or Convergence?

Modernization and the Male–Female Suicide Ratio in India 1967–1997: Divergence or Convergence?


  1. Della M. Steen BA (Hons)*
  2. Peter Mayer PhD
Article first published online: 6 JAN 2011
DOI: 10.1521/suli.34.2.147.32782


The traditional view that modernization is likely to increase male vulnerability to suicide while protecting females from such self-destruction was offered by Durkheim (1951). This implies a theory of divergence of suicide rates such that the male–female suicide ratio should increase with modernization. Contemporary researchers have questioned whether modernization has had such an impact. We conducted a time series analysis of male and female suicide data to determine the impact on the suicide ratio for India for the years 1967 to 1997. We developed a modernization index comprised of urbanization, female literacy, and female work participation rates. Moreover, to improve methodological efficacy, we controlled for the passage of time. However, we found that there is no significant relationship between modernization and the male-female suicide ratio. Our conclusion is that using national male–female suicide ratios to determine modernization effects may mask significant regional gender and age differences, particularly in developing countries such as India.

Gender Differences in Depression By Nancy Schimelpfening Updated September 19, 2011

Gender Differences in Depression

Updated September 19, 2011

While men and women are basically the same when it comes to the mechanics of depression, there are some subtle differences in male and female depression due to society's expectations of what being a particular gender means, as well as hormonal differences.
1. Gender Differences in Depression Symptoms
Men and women share the same core set of depression symptoms: depressed mood, lack of motivation, loss of pleasure, changes in appetite, sleep disturbances, feelings of guilt and difficulty concentrating. However, studies suggest that some differences in the symptom patterns exhibited by men and women.
  • More About Gender Differences in Depression Symptoms

  • 2. Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Depression
    It has been widely documented that there are gender difference in depression prevalence, with women experiencing major depression about twice as often as men. The lifetime risk of major depression in women is about 20% to 26%, compared to about 8% to 12% for men. This risk exists independent of race or ethnicity.
  • More About Gender Differences in the Prevalence of Depression

  • 3. Gender Differences in Suicide
    One of the most commonly reported differences in male and female suicide behavior is method selection. Men tend to choose more violent -- and thus more likely to be lethal -- methods, such as hanging, vehicle exhaust gas, asphyxiation and firearms. Women, on the other hand, are more likely to choose self-poisoning.
  • More About Gender Differences in Suicide

  • 4. Gender Differences in Response to Antidepressants
    There is ongoing controversy about whether men and women respond equally well to antidepressants. A 1996 meta-analysis, which reviewed 35 studies comparing men's and women's responses to the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine, found a statistically significant better response to the drug among the men studied. A later randomized double-blind study, which compared men's and women's responses to imipramine and the SSRI antidepressant sertraline (Zoloft), found that the women responded better to sertraline, while the men responded best to imipramine. It should be noted, however, that when the results were analyzed based upon whether the women had entered menopause, it was found that postmenopausal women responded equally well to both medications. The implication of this is, for unknown reasons, SSRIs work better in the presence of estrogen.
  • More About Gender Differences in Response to Antidepressants
  • Sources:
    Gorman, J. M. "Gender differences in depression and response to psychotropic medication." Gender Medicine 3.2 (2006): 93-109.
    Katz, Vern L. et. al., eds. Comprehensive Gynecology 5th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2007.
    Payne, Sarah, Viren Swami, Debbi L. Stanistreet. "The social construction of gender and its influence on suicide: a review of the literature." Journal of Men's Health 5.1 (March 2008): 23-35.
    Piccinelli, Marco and Greg Wilkinson. "Gender differences in depression." British Journal of Psychiatry 177 (2000): 486-492.
    Winkler, Dietmar, Edda Pjrek and Siegfried Kasper. "Gender-specific symptoms of depression and anger attacks." The Journal of Men's Health & Gender 3.1 (March 2006): 19-24.

    Gender differences in suicide

    Gender differences in suicide rates have been shown to be significant; there are highly asymmetric rates of attempted and completed suicide between males and females.[1] The gap, also called the gender paradox of suicidal behavior, can vary significantly between different countries.[2] Statistics indicate that males die much more often by means of suicide than do females; however, reported suicide attempts and thoughts are much more common among females than males


    Gender paradox[edit]

    Suicides per 100,000 people per year[5]
    RankCountryMalesFemalesTotalYear
    1 Lithuania68.112.938.62005
    2 Belarus63.310.335.12003
    3 Russia58.19.832.22005
    4 Slovenia42.111.126.32006
    5 Hungary42.311.226.02005
    6 Kazakhstan45.08.125.92005
    7 Latvia42.09.624.52005
    ... USA17.74.5112005
    Suicide rate per 100,000 males (left) and per 100,000 females (right) (data from 1978–2008)
      no data
      < 1
      1–5
      5–5.8
      5.8–8.5
      8.5–12
      12–19
      19–22.5
      22.5–26
      26–29.5
      29.5–33
      33–36.5
      >36.5

    United States suicide rates for white men, by Health Service Area, 1988–1992. This map and the map below use the same color scale: note the large difference in rates between men and women. The regional patterns for men and women are similar, but not the same.[6]

    United States suicide rates for white women, by Health Service Area, 1988–1992.[6]
    The role that gender plays as a risk factor for suicide has been studied extensively. While females tend to show higher rates of reported nonfatal suicidal behavior, males have a much higher rate of completed suicide.[2] A 2008 study of suicide attempts by gender found that females have a higher rate of attempted suicide than males earlier in life, which decreases with age.[7] For males the rate of attempted suicide remains fairly constant when controlled for age. Males and females also tend to differ in their methods of suicide and responses to suicidal feelings.

    Factors[edit]

    Many researchers have attempted to find explanations for why gender is such a significant indicator for suicide. One common explanation relies on the social constructions of hegemonic masculinity andfemininity. In a review of the literature on gender and suicide, male suicide rates were explained in terms of traditional gender roles. Male gender roles tend to emphasize greater levels of strength, independence, and risk-taking behavior.[8] Reinforcement of this gender role often prevents males from seeking help for suicidal feelings and depression.[9]
    Numerous other factors have been put forward as the cause of the gender paradox. Part of the gap may be explained by heightened levels of stress that result from traditional gender roles. For example, death of a spouse and divorce are risk factors for suicide in both genders, but the effect is somewhat mitigated for females.[10] In the Western world, females are more likely to maintain social and familial connections that they can turn to for support after losing their spouse.[10] Another factor closely tied to gender roles is employment status. Males' vulnerability may be heightened during times of unemployment because of gendered expectations that males should provide for themselves and their families.[9]
    It has been noted that the gender gap is less stark in developing nations. One theory put forward for the smaller gap is the increased burden of motherhood due to cultural norms. In regions where the identity of females is constructed around the family, having young children may correlate with lower risks for suicide.[8] At the same time, stigma attached to infertility or having children outside of marriage can contribute to higher rates of suicide among women.[11]
    In 2003, a group of sociologists examined the gender and suicide gap by considering how cultural factors impacted suicide rates. The four cultural factors; power-distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance, and masculinity, were measured for 66 countries using data from the World Health Organization.[12] Cultural beliefs regarding individualism were most closely tied to the gender gap; countries that placed a higher value on individualism showed higher rates of male suicide. Power-difference, defined as the social separation of people based on finances or status, was a negative correlate to suicide, however countries with high levels of power-difference had higher rates of female suicide.[12] The study ultimately found that stabilizing cultural factors had a stronger effect on suicide rates for women than men.[12]

    Differing methods by gender[edit]

    The reported difference in suicide rates for males and females is partially a result of the methods used by each gender. Although females attempt suicide at a higher rate, they are more likely to use methods that are less immediately lethal. Males frequently complete suicide via high mortality actions such as hanging, carbon-monoxide poisoning, and gun violence. This is in contrast to females, who tend to rely on drug overdosing.[13] While overdosing can be deadly, it is less immediate and therefore more likely to be caught before death occurs. In Europe, where the gender discrepancy is the greatest, a study found that the most frequent method of suicide among both genders was hanging, however the use of hanging was much higher in males (54.3%) than in females (35.6%). The same study found that the second most common methods were fire arms for men and poisoning for women.[14]
    Methods of suicide are frequently correlated with both with traditional gender roles and availability of different methods. Men are more likely than women to both use and own firearms, which could account for the higher rates of firearm death among males. In nations where firearms have been banned, there is a drop in male suicides via gun but no change in females.[8] Females may tend towards less lethal methods of suicide because of gendered ideas about attractiveness.[8][13]

    Preventative strategies[edit]

    Public policy in most nations does not reflect the reality of gender-based factors on suicide. In the United States both the Department of Health and Human Services and the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention address different methods of reducing suicide but do not recognize the separate needs of males and females.[8] In 2002, the English Department of Health launched a suicide prevention campaign that was aimed at high-risk groups including young men, prisoners, and those with mental health disorders.[8] Campaign Against Living Miserably is a charity in the UK that attempts to highlight this issue for public discussion. Researchers have also recommended more aggressive and long-term treatment and follow up for males that show indications of suicidal thoughts. Shifting cultural attitudes about gender roles and norms, and especially ideas about masculinity, may also contribute to closing the gender gap. Some studies have found that because young females are at a higher risk of attempting suicide, policies tailored towards this demographic are most effective at reducing overall rates.[15]
    It is important to note that there is no specifically male or female suicide pattern that applies in all cases. Prevention policies tailored towards males can also apply to females cases, and vice versa.[13]

    Rates[edit]

    The incidence of completed suicide is vastly higher among males than females among all age groups in most of the world.

    United States[edit]

    In the United States, the male to female suicide death ratio varies between 3:1 to 10:1.[16] Typically males die from suicide three to four times more often as females, and not unusually five or more times as often. Females report attempting suicide at a higher rate than males in the United States. When accounting for parasuicide, the rate between males and females shifts to 1:2. This is likely due to several factors, including a higher risk for depression among females in the United States.[17] Use of mental health resources may be a significant contributor to gendered suicide rates in the US. Studies have shown that females are 13-21% more likely than males to receive a psychiatric affective diagnosis.[18]While 72-89% of females who suicided had contact with a mental health professional at some point in their life, only 41-58% of males who suicided had made use of this resource.[18]
    Within the US there are variances in gendered rates of suicide by ethnic group.[19] A 2008 study showed that the rate of suicide death is highest among American Indian and Alaskan Native males, and lowest among African American females.[19] Rates of attempted suicide are highest among American Indian and Alaskan Native females and lowest among African American and White males.[19] This reflects the general trend expected by the gender paradox. Explanations for why rates of attempted and completed suicide vary by ethnicity are often based on cultural differences. Among African American victims, it has been suggested that females usually have better access to communal and familial relations that may mitigate other risk factors for suicide. Among Hispanic populations, the same study showed that cultural values of marianismo, which emphasizes female docility and deference to males, may help explain the higher rate of suicide among Latinas relative to Latinos.[19] The authors of this study did not extrapolate their conclusions on ethnicity to populations outside the United States.

    Europe[edit]

    The gender-suicide gap is generally highest in Western countries. Among the nations of Europe, the gender gap is particularly large in Eastern European countries such asLithuaniaBelarus, and Hungary. Some researchers attribute the higher rates in former Soviet countries to be a remnant of recent political instability. An increased focus on family under Soviet control led to females becoming more highly valued. Rapid economic fluctuations prevented males from providing fully for their families, which prevented them from fulfilling their traditional gender role. Combined, these factors could account for the gender gap.[9][14] Other research indicates that higher instances of alcoholism among males in these nations may be to blame.[20]

    Non-western nations[edit]

    Excess male mortality from suicide is also evident from data from non-Western countries. In 1979-81, out of 74 countries with a non-zero suicide rate, 69 countries had male suicide rates greater than females, two reported equal rates for the sexes (Seychelles and Kenya), three reported female rates exceeding male rates (Papua New GuineaMacau, and French Guiana).[21] The contrast is even greater today, with WHO statistics showing China as the only country where the suicide rate of female matches or exceeds that of males.[22] Barraclough found that the female rates of those aged 5–14 equaled or exceeded the male rates only in 14 countries, mainly in South America and Asia.[23]

    China[edit]

    In most countries, most committed suicides are made by men, but in China women are 40% more likely to commit suicide.[24] It has been found that suicide makes up for about 30% of deaths of women living in rural China.[25] Traditional gender roles in China hold women responsible for keeping the family happy and intact. Suicide for women in China is shown in literature to be an acceptable way to avoid disgrace that may be brought to themselves or their families.[24] One explanation for increased suicide in women in China is that pesticides are easily accessible and tend to be used in many suicide attempts made by women. Another explanation is that women are seen as subservient to men due to Chinese gender roles. Thirdly, difficult living conditions and strict views on marriage and family values cause women high stress which is a risk factor for suicidal behavior.[26] The rate of nonlethal suicidal behavior is 40 to 60 percent higher in women as it is in men. This is due to the fact that more women are depressed than men, and also that depression is correlated with suicide attempts.[24]
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BANGLADESH: When sexual harassment leads to suicide

    DHAKA, 13 December 2010 (IRIN) - Sexual harassment against girls and women in Bangladesh is turning deadly: 28 women have committed suicide this year and another seven attempted it to escape frequent sexual harassment, says a Dhaka-based human rights organization, Ain O Salish Kendra (ASK).

    A father also committed suicide fearing social insult after his daughter was harassed and in other cases, stalkers killed three women, reported the NGO. 

    According to the Bangladesh National Women Lawyers’ Association, almost 90 percent of girls aged 10-18 years have experienced what is known locally as “eve-teasing”,  where boys intercept girls on the street, and shout obscenities, laugh at them or grab their clothes. 

    Eve-teasing has escalated ever since girls and women started entering formal education and employment in larger numbers in the 1980s, said Paul Subrata Malakar, from the NGO Plan International, in Dhaka. 

    ImpactsOn 16 November, Sharmin*, a 20-year-old student in Dinanjpur, (400km northwest of Dhaka), was returning home from college when a stalker forcibly held her hand and tried to hug her. 

    Since then, her parents say, she has stopped going to college. 

    “As sexual violence is happening on the way to school, it will panic parents and the parents will discourage their daughters from going to school,” said Rekha Saha, director of Dhaka-based NGO, Steps Towards Development. 

    In a country where 1.5 million girls (out of 10.4 million eligible) are not enrolled in school, an unknown number are avoiding school out of fear and humiliation of daily harassment. 

    Since January of this year, ASK has received 61 complaints from girls who had dropped out of school because they were harassed. 

    Moreover, in a country where more than 64 percent of girls marry before they are 18, some parents have pushed eve-teasing victims into early marriage to “protect” their honour and safety, said Malakar and Saha. 

    Causes 
    Ishrat Shamim, a gender studies expert and professor of sociology at Dhaka University, is calling for further investigation into the causes of the rise in violence against women. 

    “[The] mindset of both men and women is important. Many men, also women, believe women are second-class citizens after men. [While] women’s participation in education, the labour force and other activities is increasing, men are not yet to get used to seeing women outside the home.” 

    Changing this mindset has proven to be a long-standing obstacle. 

    “In a male-dominant society, eve-teasing can be viewed as a rite of passage for boys on their way to becoming men,” said Malakar of Plan International. “All the steps [we take] will be futile unless the male segment of the society change its patriarchal mindset.” 

    The fact that girls are hesitant to report violence has made studying and fighting the phenomenon even more difficult. 

    “Many girls believe that if they complain, their parents and community leaders will blame her,” said Sayeda*, a 14-year-old student in the capital, Dhaka. 

    mw/cm/pt/mw 

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A Gendered Analysis of Sex Differences in Suicide-Related Behaviors:
    A National (U.S.) and International Perspective  ----by  Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Ph.D.
    University of South Alabama


    Abstract
    Evidence was reviewed for national (U.S.) and international sex differences in suicidal behavior.
    Suicidal behavior included suicide ideation, suicide attempts, and suicide completions, as well as
    suicide-prone behaviors. Across most countries, females have higher rates of suicide ideation and
    more frequent suicide attempts than males; females also score higher than males on measures of
    suicidality that overlap with depression assessments. However, males generally have higher rates
    of suicide completions. Therefore, identification of at-risk males remains an important task. Yet,
    common suicide prediction self-report measures identify more females than males. Using a
    measure of suicide proneness that assessed engagement in traditionally defined suicidal behavior,
    as well as engagement in risky and/or illness producing behaviors, United States males were
    found to be more suicide-prone than females. This measure has not yet been used internationally.
    These results were used to argue that the ability to detect male and female suicidal individuals is
    enhanced by utilizing both traditional and non-traditional suicide proneness measures. Reviewed
    research revealed similar suicidal risk factors for males and females. However, the prevalence
    and strength of prediction of certain risk factors were found to vary gender-specifically. These
    findings support the utility of gender-sensitive suicide assessment, prevention and intervention
    strategies.3



    A Gendered Analysis of Sex Differences in Suicide-Related Behaviors:
    A National (U.S.) and International Perspective
    Introduction- Sex Differences in Suicide
    The purpose of this paper is to conduct a gendered analysis of sex differences in the
    frequency, risk factors, and outcome of a broad range of suicidal behavior occurring within the
    United States and around the world. According to official statistics (e.g., World Health Statistics
    Annual, 1998), in many countries, there are differences in the rate and expression of men and
    women’s suicidal behavior. For example, in the United States, across most age groups, men
    complete suicide more often than women, yet women attempt suicide more often than men
    (McIntosh, 1993; National Center for Health Statistics, 1994). The trend for males to complete
    suicide more than females was also found in all but one of the 56 countries catalogued by Lester
    (1997). Furthermore, Lester (1997) concluded, “While male suicide rates seem to be rising
    worldwide, females rates do not." Lester (1998) reviewed the international statistics on youth
    suicide and came to the same conclusion; male youth were more likely to experience an increase
    in their suicide rates than female youth. These findings suggest that sex differences in rates of
    suicide completion’s are becoming more pronounced over time (males greater than females).
    Taken as a whole, these data have been used to contend that there are inherent sex differences in
    the extent and expression of suicidality, which need to be understood with a gender-sensitive
    analysis. A gender-sensitive approach considers how the social, cultural, and power roles of men
    and women, rather than inherent biological differences, can be used to better understand any
    obtained sex differences in suicidal behavior (Gender and Health: Technical Paper, World Health
    Organization, 1998).4
    Based on suicide completion rate differences, it has typically bA Gendered Analysis of Sex Differences in Suicide-Related Behaviors:
    A National (U.S.) and International Perspective
    Introduction- Sex Differences in Suicide
    The purpose of this paper is to conduct a gendered analysis of sex differences in the
    frequency, risk factors, and outcome of a broad range of suicidal behavior occurring within the
    United States and around the world. According to official statistics (e.g., World Health Statistics
    Annual, 1998), in many countries, there are differences in the rate and expression of men and
    women’s suicidal behavior. For example, in the United States, across most age groups, men
    complete suicide more often than women, yet women attempt suicide more often than men
    (McIntosh, 1993; National Center for Health Statistics, 1994). The trend for males to complete
    suicide more than females was also found in all but one of the 56 countries catalogued by Lester
    (1997). Furthermore, Lester (1997) concluded, “While male suicide rates seem to be rising
    worldwide, females rates do not." Lester (1998) reviewed the international statistics on youth
    suicide and came to the same conclusion; male youth were more likely to experience an increase
    in their suicide rates than female youth. These findings suggest that sex differences in rates of
    suicide completion’s are becoming more pronounced over time (males greater than females).
    Taken as a whole, these data have been used to contend that there are inherent sex differences in
    the extent and expression of suicidality, which need to be understood with a gender-sensitive
    analysis. A gender-sensitive approach considers how the social, cultural, and power roles of men
    and women, rather than inherent biological differences, can be used to better understand any
    obtained sex differences in suicidal behavior (Gender and Health: Technical Paper, World Health
    Organization, 1998).4
    Based on suicide completion rate differences, it has typically by been argued that the more
    lethal suicidal behavior of men is what mainly needs to be understood for suicide prevention and
    intervention purposes. However, some researchers have debated the extent, nature, and
    interpretation of the suicide rate differences between males and females. For example, the
    method hypothesis asserts that men and women are equally prone to self-destruction, but merely
    chose different methods of suicide expression, because of their gender, that results in a different
    levels of fatality (Garland and Zigler, 1993). They argue that gender roles dictate that men not
    “fail” at suicide, which leads them to choose highly lethal methods of self-destruction.
    Conversely, gender roles for women encourage delicacy and attention to appearance, even in
    death. As a result, women may be more likely to choose a method that will not result in blood or
    disfigurement (e.g., pills rather than guns). These methods tend to be less likely to result in
    fatality, even if the intention to die was equally high for the woman. Certainly, since suicide
    completion rates rely solely on outcome, they fail to account for intent (Kushner, 1985;
    Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Sanders, Crane, & Monson, 1998). Individuals who unexpectedly
    survive an intentional and lethal suicidal act are not counted in the completed suicide rates. Since
    women appear to be more likely than men to select suicide methods that allow time for discovery
    and intervention (e.g., overdose), women might be more likely than men to survive what could be
    a completed suicide. Not counting these occurrences would result in an underreporting of
    females’ potentially lethal suicidal behavior.
    In fact, many researchers have suggested the reported magnitude of the suicide mortality
    sex differential is not accurate, because of the difficulties inherent in collecting valid data about
    completed suicides (Madge & Harvey, 1999). Less valid official data is thought to occur because
    of the classification biases of individual coroners and physicians, and as well as differences in5
    state and national laws regarding suicide determination. For example, at times, in some areas
    within the United States, it has only been possible to consider a death by suicide if the deceased
    left a suicide note. There may be gender differences in the likelihood of this documentation.
    State, regional, and national differences in suicide classification rules can result in generalized
    underreporting and can also lead to age, sex, and racial group rate biases (Holinger, Offer, Barter,
    & Bell, 1994). Even without excessively stringent decision rules such as noted above, it is
    possible that a number of suicides are labeled “accidents” because there is not enough evidence
    to conclude conclusively that they are suicides. It has been estimated that the actual incidence of
    suicide in groups with a high rate of accidental death might be up to three times the official
    recorded level (Madge & Harvey, 1999). Since these types of suicides may be more utilized by
    women than men, female suicides may be more likely to be underreported. In fact, in a study of
    the adequacy of official suicide statistics, Phillips and Ruth (1993) conclude that suicides can be
    misclassified into at least five other causes of death. They state that suicides are most likely to be
    underreported for groups with low official suicide rates, namely females and African-Americans.
    Furthermore, there may be other reasons to underreport suicide that change the validity of
    the reported rates. For example, Kushner (1985) has argued that cultural notions of femininity, in
    conjunction with societal beliefs that women’s suicidal behaviors are a direct reflection of
    relationship failures may provide subtle incentives for family members, physicians, and public
    health officials to underreport female suicide completions. In the United States, the construct of
    femininity does not typically include completed suicide. Instead, women are thought to “attempt”
    suicide and commit suicidal gestures as a “cry for help” (Canetto, 1992-93). Furthermore,
    motherhood in many cultures is considered a sacred gender role. Many cultures hold the value
    that mothers are not supposed to abandon their children, so there may be additional reasons to6
    underreport female suicides in which children are left. However, this stands in contrast to some
    data revealing that single mothers in some countries might be at particular risk for suicidality
    (Weitoft, Haglund, & Rosen, 2000).
    As a contrast, male suicide has been viewed in some cultures as a legitimate answer to
    economic difficulties and other potential humiliations. Explanations of men’s suicides have often
    focused on issues of performance and achievement (Canetto, 1992-93), rather than love, which is
    evoked for women’s suicides. Male suicide has also, at times, been socially sanctioned as a
    patriarchic duty (i.e., Kamikaze). Certainly, these gender and culture values can effect how a
    death is classified. Generally, because of these gender roles, it has been thought that women’s
    suicides are underreported.
    Some biases, however, might also differentially lower the official rate of male suicide.
    For example, Rockett and Thomas (1999) reported that over half of both the official
    unintentional firearm deaths and those of undetermined intent among males aged 18 to 21 years
    of age in Israel were ultimately determined to be misclassified suicides. Overall, because
    gendered and cultured biases can alter the reported rates of both female and male completed
    suicide, it is difficult to know the true gender differential when comparing completed suicide
    rates from different states, regions, and countries.
    Consequently, Kushner and others have argued that it is more appropriate to combine the
    rates of fatal and nonfatal suicidal behavior when comparing the suicidal behavior of men and
    women (Kushner, 1985; Langhinrichsen et al., 1998). When this data comparison strategy is
    employed, women are found to be at greater risk than men for suicidal behavior. In fact, using
    this logic, Canetto and Lester (1995b) conclude that while suicidologists have tended to focus
    almost exclusively on suicide mortality, which is typically male and quite infrequent, from an7
    epidemiological standpoint, the nonfatal suicidal behavior engaged in by women is more
    normative and certainly equally worthy of attention. Considering the potential biases and their
    possibly conflicting impact on male and female completed suicide rates, in the current paper, it is
    argued that a complete understanding of both the fatal and nonfatal suicidal behavior of men and
    women is necessary to inform suicide prevention and intervention efforts.